Well, we have all heard that you have gone back on your word, having initially distanced yourself from the viability of the Free Senior High School policy of your main political opponent, Nana Akufo-Addo, in the run-up to the 2012 elections.
As it appears, your backtracking suggests there’s some good in the policy preached by the New Patriotic Party. Ideally, any country that seeks to build its foundation on education must be commended.
Together with health, I find education as one of the most critical aspects of our economy -- hence assiduousness must be the keyword in our dealings with those sectors.
I must say, however, that I am not particularly enthused about your announcement of free SHS for day students beginning 2015.
Mr. President, must we always reduce important sectors like education to this political ping-pong? While we even struggle to get the basics right, why are we are still committing ourselves to more complicated decisions which have the potential of nudging us further into the path of despondency?
Sad to say, after we fumbled through the introduction of the four-year SHS system, we are now being treated to another meal of a decision borne from a lack of foresight. Mr. President, what is wrong with our educational system? We need to answer this fundamental question first before moving on to proffer solutions.
I believe the problem of our educational system is not about the quantity of products churned out every year, but rather their quality. This is where I find myself miles apart from you over your recent pronouncement.
When people questioned the NPP’s Free SHS policy, it was not plain antagonism. The national debate over this policy was one of the most intellectual debates in our political discourse.
Industry has always complained that the quality of products churned by universities and polytechnics are short of standard. This is not a failure of the universities; rather it is a failure of the entire educational system.
The quality of our educational system has deteriorated and what I would rather have you and your government do is to fix these problems rather than a move that will only reinforce a mass production of low-quality SHS graduates.
In 2012, you argued that education must be progressively free, which sounded the more prudent suggestion around that time. Definitely, if you live in a country where teaching aids are always delayed and standard of teaching is unconvincing, you don’t compound your problems by granting wider access, especially when you have not dealt with the small numbers you have.
In 2007, when the duration of SHS was increased from three years (though technically it was two-and-half) to four years without proper infrastructural provision, all of us witnessed the chaos it brought. Every available space in schools was converted to classrooms regardless -- from canteens, chapels, dining halls and libraries.
Here we are again about to make a mistake that will eventually send us back to the drawing board. When it comes to education, we are all stakeholders and must not allow politicians to toy with it. Sometimes we must be vociferous in showing our displeasure at attempts by politicians to mess it up.
With all due respect, I think this move by your government smacks of populism. At a time when you say the meat is down to the bones, where are we expecting to raise those huge monies to fund these extravagant promises? Already, the rapid fall of the cedi is threatening to override all targets set by your government.
Mr. President, what we need now is assurance that the current difficulties are being managed properly and not promises.
I remember also that even when the National Health Insurance Scheme was on its knees, we were promised a one-off premium.
Thankfully, the one-off premium never came because it would have sent us back to the cash-and-carry days. Please, Mr. President and your NDC government, we have enough problems already facing our small country. Let’s tackle these problems first before we start inflicting more harm on ourselves.
Sir, you know what the famous American theologian James Freeman Clack said about politicians? He said: "The difference between a politician and a statesman is: a politician thinks of the next election and a statesman thinks of the next generation.”
Mr. President, don’t give us the impression you are thinking about the 2016 elections. I know you would like to be remembered as a statesman – and a fine one at that. If that’s the case just watch before you leap.
I’ll stop here because I know you don’t have much time.
Best regards.
No comments:
Post a Comment